Perspectives: Roger Waters and some of his fans - not all of them.
By Matthew Anthony Allair
Often
there’s three sides to every story, and the truth is somewhere in the middle
It’s no
surprise in some ways, that Pink Floyd’s former bass player, singer, and
co-founder, Roger Waters put himself into hot water over insensitive comments
about Ozzy Osbourne’s passing, and his dismissal of Black Sabbath as a musical
force. Old school Floyd fans have known about his antics since the early
eighties. In the past, Roger was blessed with having segments of the public
just ignore and dismiss his colorful comments - decades ago.
(To
digress, frustratingly, I do have the Saucer
Full Of Secrets and Inside Out books, but they are in storage, and so
I had to make due at the time of this writing.)
Is There Anybody In There?
I realize
I will do myself no favors by jumping into the fray as this debate can be
polarizing for many. All Roger had to do was make a bland public statement such
as the following:
“Ozzy
Osbourne was a colorful character in life, and Black Sabbath was an interesting
band. My sympathies go towards his family and fans at this moment.”
Roger’s ongoing feud with composer Andrew Lloyd Webber went on for years. The gist of that feud had to do with Roger’s plagiarism accusations with Webber over his “Phantom of the Opera” piece, and a descending and ascending riff from “Echoes” from 1971’s Meddle album. While there’s a basis for the argument in their similarities, as of this writing, neither Gilmour, or Mason have considered, or agreed to legal action against Webber for copyright issues, and I find that odd if there’s a legitimate grievance. I am not going to dispute if there are similarities between the pieces, there are.
These days, there’s a contingent of Waters fans who rabidly defend any action he takes, some are the next generation of hipster media writers who ignore the bands history, or a sliver are socialists who defend Roger for his noble causes surrounding Palestinians, Gaza, the West Bank, or his screeds against conservatives in British government and parliament.Embryo
Here's a
brief sampling from David Gilmour and Wet Dream and for you to
decide for yourself.
All video music samples are in compliance with "Fair Use" and are for educational reference.
Roger simply didn’t seem to like Richard’s keyboard style at that point by 1978 and seemed to think his approach didn’t match what he envisioned for The Wall. Regarding the claim that Richard ‘played almost nothing on the album’, of the 26 tracks, Richard played on 20. It is almost true that Bob Ezrin played piano on the number of the more notable tracks, the Piano on ‘Nobody Home’ was Ezrin - as it’s a very different style from Richard - Bob had played on Kiss’s Beth’ and had played keyboards on various Alice Cooper records, so he was an adept Piano player – just different.
Let’s address that claim that A Momentary Lapse of Reason was just populated by ‘session players’. You are aware that The Wall was populated by some session players as well? Aside from Bob Ezrin and Michael Kaman, other session players included Fred Mandel, Jeff Porcaro, Lee Ritenour, Joe di Blassi, Joe Porcaro, Bobbye Hall, and Travor Veitch. Never mind the session players that populate The Final Cut sessions from 1983. Roger’s arguments seem disingenuous.
Now, there’s no argument that The Dark Side of the Moon, Wish You Were Here, Animals and The Wall are brilliant albums. But of the four, Animals is the most blunt lyrically, challenging and for some, less accessible, yet there are Water’s fans who find that bluntness appealing, to each their own. I find the albums between 1968-1972 fascinating for a number of reasons, A Saucerful of Secrets, More, Ummagumma, Atom Heart Mother, Meddle, and Obscured By Clouds may be wildly uneven, but they also felt democratic as a band unit.
The ugly
truth is that Roger destroyed the democracy of the band after 1975 to further
his personal vision. He started to see his band mates as mere ‘session players’.
What may have appeared to be an aberration with the Animals album in
1977, started to turn into a pattern of Roger being the dominant, tyrannical
leader and writer – he just arrogantly presumed he should be the primary song
writer – and of course when you take into account publishing royalties, it’s
quite a clever racket and gaslight to steer in that direction. Roger’s
projected wealth is at around 310 Million and higher than the others – he knew
what he was doing. I can’t say he’s a victim by any means.
What Do You Want From Me?
While you could argue that Momentary Lapse acts as a Gilmour solo record, by the time of the Division Bell album, the band were truly a democratic band again. Richard had co-writing credit on four songs, and sings lead on ‘Wearing The Inside Out’. By extension, the mostly instrumental follow up and posthumous The Endless River. Richard is credited with co-writing 11 tracks. David also liked Richard enough and regarded him highly to have Richard appear on two songs from his On An Island solo release from 2006 and had him tour with him for the album prior to his passing. Yes, I am aware that you could argue that Endless River are just leftovers from the Division Bell album, in the same way you would argue that The Final Cut are just leftovers from The Wall sessions. But the intents were different, by 1983 Roger assumed the band was over, whereas by 2013, Endless River was released to wrap up unfinished business and honor Richard.
When Roger’s Amused To Death was released in September of 1992. It did significantly better than its prior releases. Charting at number 8 in the UK and at 21 in the US Billboard 100. When Pink Floyd’s The Division Bell was released in March, 1994, It peaked at number one in the UK and US album charts – and it is the most democratic sounding album in a long time. To be fair, if people don’t like the Gilmour era albums, that’s perfectly fine. But if you simply look at the gamble Roger took leaving Pink Floyd by 1984 – with him assuming it was a ‘spent force’ – he misread the room.
Eclipse
In contrast in 1975 when Peter Gabriel left Genesis, that gamble paid off and Peter had a more viable solo career, while Genesis continued on to their own fortunes as band, everyone benefited. There’s the adage, “Pride goeth before the fall,” from Proverbs 16:18, and Roger’s hubris got in the way with reality. Part of me can’t blame him. The 1973 success of Dark Side of The Moon must have been a major adjustment for all concerned in the band, and people react differently to sudden changes in fortune. Once the follow up, Wish You Were Here in 1975 was an equal success, it had to have affected Roger’s confidence and he misread the room. Some of my points are verified by the above article.
I wish
more people would view Pink Floyd and Genesis in a similar light. The guys in
Genesis have stated that they view the band as a ‘writers workshop’ to explore
various ideas and types of music. In spite of Floyd’s really reputation as
‘space rock’ jam band, Floyd really evolved with an emphasis on song craft even
before the mid-seventies. While both bands are very different, they ended up
arriving at similar results by the mid eighties, for good or ill.
We haven’t
even discussed Nick Mason’s thoughts on much of this post 2005. Nick has
remained social friends with both David and Roger, and he had some thoughts
about the tensions as sited from this article:
“It’s
a really odd thing in my opinion. But I think the problem is that Roger doesn’t
really respect David. He feels that writing is everything and that guitar
playing and the signing are something that, I won’t say anyone can do, but that
everything should be judged on the writing rather than the playing…I think it
rankles with Roger that he made a sort of error in a way that he left the band
assuming without him it would fold. It’s a constant irritation really, that
he’s still going back to it. I’m hesitant to get too stuck into this one, just
because it’s between the two of them rather than me. I actually get along with
the both of them, and I think it’s really disappointing that these rather
elderly gentlemen are still at loggerheads.”
Some of his points make sense, David may have always been seen as the new kid in the band, even by the end of the seventies, so David’s control of the band in later years was a real test. Part of the issue is the differing perspectives between the basic writing of a piece and that arrangements. The core view is that the basic chords, lyrics and lead melody is the writing, but the process is complicated and the ideas of the players can shape the arrangement, David’s view seems to be that Roger is too dogmatic on the finer points.
Early
songs such as “If..” from Atom Heart Mother show there’s a real humanity
in there with Roger – and self-awareness, but he seems so doused in this public
façade of scorn, you can’t tell, half the time, who the real person is there. Perhaps
the ego, hubris or narcissism has won out, and that’s a real shame if true. I can’t
speak for that as I don’t know what’s in his heart or head. Only he could
answer that.
I remember that Live Aid performance in 2005 with the full band, as mentioned here. Roger seemed genuinely thrilled to be there, David came across as diplomatically muted, and the sad reality is that the damage had been done long before 1987. I don’t read it as just a jilted ego from David – he seems to truly not like how Roger treats others.
It is a shame that Roger could not have been involved with The Endless River as far as playing bass an co-writing several songs, it would have given the album a more final definitive stamp as the album was intended as a tribute to Richard, we will never know. I admit that a few more proper songs could have rounded out the album.
Paranoid EyesThere’s also the issue that David seems to treat his band mates better on his tours, and I could argument that ‘character matters’. Roger has a reputation for cultivating tension, he even fired his son keyboardist Harry Waters in 2016, after he had toured with his father for 14 years. Now, it’s common for band leaders to dismiss members at the end of tours, nothing new. But the reasonings seemed cryptic and callous. Perhaps so Roger could prove a point about Nepotism? I don’t know. This was first noted in the late eighties regarding Roger’s solo tours.
I haven’t
even tackled his politics - which I am indifferent to - but some recent choices
are illustrative of his inability to read a room. Yes, Roger is a dedicated
socialist, it is what it is. Regarding the events circa 2022, when he was
fronting another revival of the Pink Floyd The Wall tour, and when
certain references of the stage show was interpreted as being Antisemitic
regarding criticism of Isreal, the second half of the narrative of the Pink
character from the album falls into delusions and hallucinations as a fascist
leader until Pink catches himself. Roger ramped up the fascist references due
to the context of what was increasingly happening at the time. As much as I
feel that the ADL and AiPAC overplays their hands in their rhetoric, I am not
certain that Roger is an actual antisemite. But due to his father’s death in
WWII, I think Roger has developed such a blind rage against any wars, he has
lost his objectivity. It’s one thing for Roger to run concert revivals of The
Wall album in 1990, when the political stakes seemed lesser. But the social
climate had changed so much by 2022, the themes of The Wall were bound
to be misinterpreted in the changing culture.
He doesn’t see that.
There’s
also his back-and-forth stance on the Ukraine war, where he seemed to pivot
against Vladmir Putin and then defend Putin. This lead to the fight between
Gilmour’s wife Holly, against Roger, and then by extension David over the
Ukraine war. Even David and Nick wrote a song in support of Ukraine, ‘Hey Hey,
Rise Up’. I suspect Roger’s blind mistrust towards the West leads him to lose
his objectivity. Again, Roger has an uncanny ability to misread situations,
even if he stands by his connections, and even if he refuses to censor himself,
- traits that many people admire and I am not saying I object to - for such an
infinitely intelligent man, he seems to stumble a lot.
Signs Of Life
In contrast, David Gilmour has been more measured, diplomatic, he seems to be a better band leader, and one has to ask – who is the more intelligent person? Roger keeps having to recycle his Pink Floyd past, since his solo albums can’t sustain him as far as ticket sales. Gilmour retired the Pink Floyd enterprise as an actual unit, and released three solo albums, On an Island, Rattle That Lock and Luck and Strange, all three of those albums have gone number one or top ten in the US and UK album charts. As well as tours for each album that have done well. David has moved forward and is still writing music that resonates today, now that point might seem incredibly unfair to Waters fans. Again, who seems to be the more intelligent person? David has been quoted as saying:
“I have no interest in going on a tour to make
money without making new product, new art.”
People can dismiss chart success as having little to do with quality, and they would be correct, but when a player such as Gilmour has shown the ability to resonate better with an audience, then Waters thesis about having more depth may not be as important as he likes to believe or suggest. I am not saying people should dislike Roger’s solo output, if you do, more power to you, But I am suggesting there should a little more balance in the public perception. I can admire Roger’s musical legacy and input, but I can’t say I admire the man that much as I have gotten older. He just comes across as a bitter old codger these days.
Criticizing
other successful bands and musicians is often a sign of insecurity and
weakness. What I mean is the kind of withering criticism that is designed to
degrade others, that is my problem with much of the last fifteen years with
Roger. Being able to objectively look at the pros and cons in a work is a
different matter. A lot of Roger’s razor tongue may have been entertaining in
the press in the past, but it has gotten tiring. The arguments about Water’s
‘Genius’ just don’t seem that important anymore.
Roger
seems incapable of moving on – the rest of the world have moved on.
P.S. If Roger does see this - he will probably argue it's a hit piece from a 'nobody',- it is what it is. No Roger, I am not a practicing Christian due to quoting a proverb for a point, and don't worry Roger, I don't plan to visit this issue again.